Terrible Tractoration, and Other Poems — A Reader’s Guide

  4   0
Fessenden, Thomas Green, 1771-1837 Project Gutenberg 2021
American poetry -- 19th century; Perkins, Elisha, 1741-1799; Tractors, Metallic Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words: 55,241
Reading time: 241 min
Text sections: 41
A satirical poem in Hudibrastic verse targeting Elisha Perkins's Metallic Tractors, framed by a mock-scientific preface and footnotes. The excerpts reveal a burlesque of medical quackery, with the author adopting the persona Dr. Christopher Caustic to parody patent medicine claims and Enlightenment-era optimism.
Share

Thomas Green Fessenden, writing under the pseudonym Dr. Christopher Caustic, opens his preface with a direct claim: he believed in the efficacy of Metallic Tractors when he wrote the poem. This admission, buried in a work that elsewhere ridicules the very same devices, sets up a layered satire. The catalog subjects list 'American poetry -- 19th century' and 'Tractors, Metallic,' but the excerpts show a text far more concerned with parodying scientific jargon and the credulity of the public than with straightforward verse. Fessenden’s preface recounts how the poem grew from a newspaper squib to a pamphlet, then to a book that earned favorable reviews. The tone is mock-earnest, and the footnotes bristle with invented credentials and absurd proposals.

The Persona of Dr. Christopher Caustic

The title page announces the author as 'Christopher Caustic, M. D., Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, Aberdeen, and Honorary Member of No Less Than Nineteen Very Learned Societies.' This piling-on of credentials is the first clue that the work is a burlesque. In the preface, Fessenden explains that he wrote the poem at the request of Benjamin Douglas Perkins, the patent holder of the Tractors. Yet the poem itself, as the excerpts show, mocks the very idea of metallic cure-alls. The footnotes are especially revealing: one proposes a method to 'take the animal machine to pieces' and 'botch it together' again, offering to rebuild an old gallant into a 'fine young buck.' The voice is consistently hyperbolic, blending pseudo-scientific detail with absurd promises.

Hudibrastic Verse and Mock-Learned Footnotes

Fessenden adopts the Hudibrastic form—rhyming couplets in iambic tetrameter, popularized by Samuel Butler’s Hudibras—to lampoon the Tractors. The excerpts include a passage where Medea’s rejuvenation of Aeson is rendered in doggerel: 'Medea cut the wither’d weasand / Of superannuated Æson.' The footnotes extend the satire by mixing classical references with contemporary slang, such as 'Bond street beau.' Another footnote describes an 'artificial earthquake' that could launch moons from the northern hemisphere, parodying Erasmus Darwin’s The Botanic Garden. The effect is a dense interplay between verse and prose, where the footnotes often carry the punchline.

Satire of Medical and Scientific Hype

The catalog subject 'Perkins, Elisha, 1741-1799' points to the historical figure behind the Tractors, but the excerpts show Fessenden targeting broader credulity. The preface states that the poem aims to 'strip folly of some of its disguises' and expose 'impudent charlatanry.' In the footnotes, the narrator proposes to 'cull hereditary diseases' from the constitution and separate 'pride from an upstart mushroom of a nobleman.' The humor lies in the deadpan delivery of impossible claims. The only obstacle, the narrator laments, is the difficulty of finding a volunteer for dissection. This self-aware absurdity is the core of the satire.

Readers should approach Terrible Tractoration as a performance. The preface and footnotes are as much a part of the satire as the poem itself. Fessenden’s persona as Dr. Caustic allows him to mock both the promoters of medical panaceas and the public that embraces them. The work rewards attention to its layered irony: the author claims to believe in the Tractors while writing a poem that makes them ridiculous. This tension between stated intent and actual content is the key to understanding the book’s humor and its critique of Enlightenment-era optimism.

Related eBooks