About 596 minutes
The Comic Poems of Thomas Hood A New and Complete Edition — Text and Context
Adventure Picaresque Fiction
136,868 recorded words. 175 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #56712For The Bruce — Background and Themes, the stored edition analysis reports 177,300 words, 12 hr 51 min estimated reading time, and 41 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 16.0 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Robert I, King of Scots, 1274-1329 -- Poetry,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 596 minutes
Adventure Picaresque Fiction
136,868 recorded words. 175 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #56712About 534 minutes
Adventure Picaresque Fiction
122,606 recorded words. 237 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #9612About 444 minutes
Adventure Picaresque Fiction
102,037 recorded words. 327 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #33403Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-25. Coverage: 93 public books, 93 available source excerpts.
Read the complete public-domain text at its original source.
Read on Project GutenbergJohn Barbour's The Bruce survives in only two manuscripts, one at St. John's College, Cambridge (C, completed 1487) and one in the Advocates' Library, Edinburgh (E, 1489), with the first three books missing from C. Editor W. M. Mackenzie's preface immediately confronts the textual problem: a series of 280 lines from Books I and II embedded in Wyntoun's Orygynale Cronykil are older than either manuscript, yet their reliability is uncertain—Wyntoun may have paraphrased or reproduced from memory. The earliest printed edition (1571) survives in a single copy, and subsequent editions by Andro Hart (1616, 1620) modernize the language. This editorial apparatus frames the poem not as a stable artifact but as a contested text.
Mackenzie's preface lays out a stemma that is anything but straightforward. The Cambridge MS (C) is earlier but incomplete; the Edinburgh MS (E) is complete but later. Wyntoun's extracts, though older, are dismissed by Mackenzie as potentially “memorial reproduction after a hurried reading” rather than a faithful witness. He explicitly rebuts J. T. T. Brown's theory that the Wyntoun passages represent an ur-Bruce later expanded by a fifteenth-century editor borrowing from contemporary authors. The editor thus positions himself as a defender of the manuscript tradition against separatist textual criticism, arguing that no warrant exists for elevating Wyntoun's “chopped-up, second-hand version” to canonical status.
The verse excerpts from Book XIX describe a night march through a moss—a boggy terrain “weill a lang myle on breid”—where the Scots lead their horses on foot, losing only a few summer stragglers. The English discover the abandoned camp at dawn and find the tracks leading into the “hidwis” moss, which they dare not follow. The passage is rich in sensory detail: blowing horns, making fires “bricht and braid,” and the “gret gladschip” upon crossing. Later, King Robert sends ten thousand men under the Earls of March and Angus to relieve the host in Wardale, and the two forces meet with “richt hamly welcummyne.” The poem's narrative voice frequently interjects with phrases like “as yhe herd me say,” maintaining a direct address to the audience.
Book XX opens with King Robert dividing his host into three parts: one besieges Norham, another Alnwick, while the king himself takes the third “fra park to park, hym for to play, / Huntand as all his awn it war.” This juxtaposition of siege warfare and royal hunting underscores the poem's presentation of Bruce as both military commander and sovereign at leisure in enemy territory. The catalog subjects classify the work under “Robert I, King of Scots—Poetry” and “Scotland—History—Robert I—Poetry,” but the excerpts show a poem equally concerned with tactical geography, troop morale, and the texture of campaign life—details that resist reduction to mere historical record.
Readers approaching The Bruce should attend to the interplay between the poem's martial narrative and its textual instability. Mackenzie's edition foregrounds the editorial decisions that shape what we read, from the choice of base manuscript to the treatment of Wyntoun's extracts. The excerpts themselves reward attention to the Scots vernacular, the formulaic epithets (“wicht and hardy”), and the recurring motif of landscape as both obstacle and ally. The poem is best read not as transparent history but as a literary artifact whose meaning is mediated by centuries of transmission.
There’s something oddly tender about old words surviving—those night marches and moss crossings in The Bruce felt like watching someone carry a fire through a storm. It made me think of another quiet companion, one found in the warm, weathered pages of Yorkshire Ditties, Second Series To which is added The Cream of Wit and Humour from his Popular Writings — A Reader’s Guide. Both left a strange, gentle ache—like a lamp left burning in a room I’d already left.
Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.